This space is destined for debates on diverse referring subjects to this clinic. A point in special that comumente it is argued in lesson is regarding what it qualifies an analyst if to intitle as such and which is its place. Cancer research is often quoted on this topic. This is an important question very and always debated by psychology pupils, candidates the psicanaltica formation and between the proper analysts. Freud will say in them that it has a tripod that is part of the formation of the analyst: first for its personal analysis, followed of clinical experience e, finally, its supervision. The analyst alone will take its analyzing until where it was in its personal analysis.
It will find support and ' ' conforto' ' in the theory and from he will have tools there to unite its theoretical knowledge to the practical clinic. A related site: muscular dystrophy mentions similar findings. Lacan also brings contributions in this aspect when it says that, the experience cannot be taught, and neither trained. It is transmitted, transit of a practical joint between and theory. thinking on the formation about psychology about the university, the graduation, I think about the difficulty of the professors whom they need to follow the scratch a daily planning and generally most of them does not have the availability to be intent and to help the pupils to mount a planning that is next to the interest to each one. how much to the periods of training, the necessary pupil to be trained, to know the rules of the institution mainly and, to be motivated to go of meeting to the satisfaction of its necessities. The trainee has that to be available to participate and to contribute in the clinical quarrels, to argue the difficulties that can have inside of the group, to help to establish a positive climate in the group, trying, when possible, to assist the others, being cooperative and to total combine the life of the group, without losing its proper individuality and originalidade.